Working in a field (harpsichord building) where our prototypes were built 300 years ago, one would think that I'm a traditionalist. Not so! I can't quite come to grips with the argument that building anything the way it was done centuries ago is intrinsically better. Let's take the lathe, for example (a tool that I use infrequently and understand even less). I can't, for the life of me, understand why anyone would choose a pedal-powered lathe over a modern, electric lathe. To say that pedal-powered lathes are the "traditional" way is to ignore a key fact. We have a choice - our ancestors didn't. I often wonder - if the craftsmen of yore had access to electricity and modern machinery, would they have used them? IMHO they would have, at least in part. What do you think?
Ernie
Ernie