Short version: How would you attach the table top of a large table to 4 posts/legs inset from the corners in a trestle type design?
Much longer version:
I have a large table I am building. The top will be 10' long x 40" wide x 2" thick. Heartwood pine material - ready to glue up right now.
My question relates to the base design and attachment of the top. This link shows a similar design:
http://www.restorationhardware.com/...p?productId=prod1593082&categoryId=cat1537023
The base will be similar to what's pictured there:
- The stretcher bar will be large, flat, and low to the ground.
- The base of the legs will have the same orientation and relative size as the picture (i.e. larger than vertical pieces and be one beam perpendicular to the long side of the table).
The change from the picture is in the vertical pieces. I have 4 posts that match kitchen island posts that are already in the house (same supplier - Osborne Wood products). These turned posts have a 6"x6" square region (i.e. unturned) at both the bottom and the top of the posts. So I plan to mortise these posts into the base and then add lag screws through the bottom beam.
The base beams are 3.5" thick and 8" wide. I plan to mortise/excavate a 6" square about 1" to 1.5" deep to sink the two posts as tenons into each base. If I mortise a full 6" wide, a 1" strip of the beam is left along each side of the mortise (because base beam is 8" wide). I think that is hefty enough, but I could cut down the tenon to a square 5" on a side or less. In addition to mortising, I plan to drive lag bolts up through the beam into the posts - I know this is into end grain of the laminated posts, but I don't see how else to do this.
I am certainly open to suggestions for base construction, but my most significant question comes with attachment of the top.
I was planning to mortise each post into the top; remember the top is a full 2" thick and so I figure I can mortise 0.5 - 0.75 inches without any problem. This will register the top of the posts in the length direction, but I am concerned that I do not have enough support for the sides of the table this way. These posts are 6" square, and they will be separated by a 9-10" gap, so the outside edges of the posts will be about 22" apart. This leaves a 9" overhang from the edge of the post to the edge of the table. Is that too much? This also does not have any direct mechanical attachemtn of base and top, I need to get some screws in there somewhere.
Also, the design as described so far does not account for seasonal movement/expansion/contraction of the table top width. My sense is that I should use a 2x2 or 1x3 rail or stretcher connecting the top of the posts across the table width (out of view; there is no table skirt). The rail would be screwed into the side of the posts, and have slots for screws into the table top.
Any critique of my plans? How would you attach the table top to 4 posts inset form the corners in a trestle type design?
I am not certain that mortising the posts into the top has any value if I use the cross rails. Do you think it does?
Henry W
hwynands@ieee.org
Much longer version:
I have a large table I am building. The top will be 10' long x 40" wide x 2" thick. Heartwood pine material - ready to glue up right now.
My question relates to the base design and attachment of the top. This link shows a similar design:
http://www.restorationhardware.com/...p?productId=prod1593082&categoryId=cat1537023
The base will be similar to what's pictured there:
- The stretcher bar will be large, flat, and low to the ground.
- The base of the legs will have the same orientation and relative size as the picture (i.e. larger than vertical pieces and be one beam perpendicular to the long side of the table).
The change from the picture is in the vertical pieces. I have 4 posts that match kitchen island posts that are already in the house (same supplier - Osborne Wood products). These turned posts have a 6"x6" square region (i.e. unturned) at both the bottom and the top of the posts. So I plan to mortise these posts into the base and then add lag screws through the bottom beam.
The base beams are 3.5" thick and 8" wide. I plan to mortise/excavate a 6" square about 1" to 1.5" deep to sink the two posts as tenons into each base. If I mortise a full 6" wide, a 1" strip of the beam is left along each side of the mortise (because base beam is 8" wide). I think that is hefty enough, but I could cut down the tenon to a square 5" on a side or less. In addition to mortising, I plan to drive lag bolts up through the beam into the posts - I know this is into end grain of the laminated posts, but I don't see how else to do this.
I am certainly open to suggestions for base construction, but my most significant question comes with attachment of the top.
I was planning to mortise each post into the top; remember the top is a full 2" thick and so I figure I can mortise 0.5 - 0.75 inches without any problem. This will register the top of the posts in the length direction, but I am concerned that I do not have enough support for the sides of the table this way. These posts are 6" square, and they will be separated by a 9-10" gap, so the outside edges of the posts will be about 22" apart. This leaves a 9" overhang from the edge of the post to the edge of the table. Is that too much? This also does not have any direct mechanical attachemtn of base and top, I need to get some screws in there somewhere.
Also, the design as described so far does not account for seasonal movement/expansion/contraction of the table top width. My sense is that I should use a 2x2 or 1x3 rail or stretcher connecting the top of the posts across the table width (out of view; there is no table skirt). The rail would be screwed into the side of the posts, and have slots for screws into the table top.
Any critique of my plans? How would you attach the table top to 4 posts inset form the corners in a trestle type design?
I am not certain that mortising the posts into the top has any value if I use the cross rails. Do you think it does?
Henry W
hwynands@ieee.org