It's also probably good to take an accounting of the financial outlay and benefits. Most but not all of us here are hobbyists. I'd wager the majority of us work out of basements, garages, and outbuildings. We might have heating and cooling in them but it probably isn't too hard for us to open the garage door or whatever. Most of us also aren't around the fine dust spewing tools 40 hours a week, either.
Fines are absolutely serious carcinogens, but there is also a world of difference in exposure between the hobby woodworker and the guy ripping boards at the cabinet shop every day. A truly state of the art dust collection system as you point out would probably be the most expensive tool in a member's shop, unless they have a very nice cnc or maybe gigantic sliding saw setup. Many people don't have 220 wiring or even the option to add it easily.
We can take reasonable steps like using dust collectors with good quality filters, wearing masks, and using air filter units. These things are not overly expensive and don't take up half the size of our shops. We should all do that and encourage safety, but I think it might do a bit of a disservice to lead some to think that without a jet turbine scrapped from a B52 and an array of 99.999999 micron pleated filters that they will get turbocancer over night. We accept some degree of risk in everything we do.
There is a middle ground between what
@teesquare and
@JimD are saying. Each one has good points, but the reality is, each person has to evaluate their own shop & look at their exposure. For example:
- how many actual hours of dust production?
- what type of dust? MDF vs plywood vs walnut, cedar etc.
- the type of machines, their inherent designs, and collection apparatuses (such as an over arm for the table saw, shroud for bandsaw, etc.)
- climate controlled shop vs. open shop determines A LOT!
- size of shop/length of duct runs
- adequate air scrubber
IMO it’s not just a huge 5HP cyclone and great filters either - which is fine don’t get me wrong, but it’s going to serious overkill for many hobby level shops, and you still have the issue of hand helds & hard to collect machines like table saws and miter saws.
I think point of use collection is often overlooked. That requires a HEPA dust extractor (much different than a shop vac). IMO shop vacs should have HEPA filters and HEPA bags. Personally it’s worth the expense.
Just to give an example on how you can’t make generalizations, my shop is not climate controlled. It is app 1500 SF. I have 12 feet of sliding doors. I have a 20” fan running 24/7, as well as a 4000CFM exhaust fan at the back.
My DC system is very rudimentary. A 1.5HP blower w/cyclone exhausted outside, and ducts to a 20” planer, 8” jointer, 18” bandsaw, drum sander, and 3HP SawStop. The farthest is the TS which is app 25’ of run.
I mention this only b/c according to the ‘rules’ it’s not supposed to work, but it does, and quite effectively. No it doesn’t get it all, but my shop is extremely well ventilated. I simply do nit need a big ClearVue unit, but still I think about getting one and do not b/c I ask myself why?
Re point of use, you need a HEPA certified dust extractor. There are a few brands out there, I elected to go with a Festool sander, track saw and dust extractor. Aside from quality the main reason was F/T known for superior dust collection.
There are also issues with certain machines, that even with the ultimate set up, you can’t get it all. For example miter saws. Table saws above the blade are are a major source of contamination and while there are excellent hoods and guards, there are many times when they simply can’t be used.
I chose to get rid of my miter station and go back to a radial arm saw. That has a 1HP blower (which doubles for my router table) and exhausts outside. It does an excellent job, too. Aside from a Festool I don’t know od any miter saw with even passable dust collection. My point is, dedicated collectors rather than running ducts everywhere may be a better solution for some.
Sorry for droning on, just thought I’d throw in a middle ground perspective