Looking for a suggestion on a basic plane to use on rough sawmill wood to smooth the blade markings. Not very large pieces, some 2-3 feet long. I have a #4, but do not wish to use on the rough stuff.
The correct term is Foreplane. It's the one to use beFORE any others.Scrub plane would be your best bet. Or do what I do - have a cheap #4 plane that I have set up for rough work.
From Fine Woodworking L. Williams.
A "scrub plane" doesn't exist in traditional Anglo/American catalogs, literature or inventories. The plane used for what you describe is a fore plane. A fore plane is the length of a jack plane or a little longer and has a cambered iron. These make a lot of sense for dimensioning stock or "thicknessing," as it was called.
The concept of thicknessing is important. Straight, flat and true is assumed and the final critical step is to plane stock to a intended and predetermined thickness. A Stanley type scrub plane used for this is an invitation to trouble. These planes are so aggressive it's easy to foul the intended thickness and end up having to use thinner than intended stock.
You can remove stock just as fast with a fore plane as with a scrub but it's more controlled because you're working with shaving width as much as depth of cut. I used to think a scrub plane was okay for very localized work but then Don McConnell pointed out that, in furniture, he wouldn't want to use a piece of stock with the kinds of stability problems that'd make the scrub plane useful.
A Stanley type scrub plane is very useful to a carpenter for uses like backing out trim or quickly leveling misaligned framing members. There just aren't a lot of uses for a scrub plane at the bench. One might use one on the edge of a piece of stock to make it slightly narrower but then that's what Stanley's old catalogs said was the intended use of their scrub planes.
What I was getting at is that none of this should be "taken as gospel". A hand plane is just a fixture to hold a blade that may have a certain degree of camber (or not). If you call it a Scrub, a Fore, a Try, whatever varies from person to person and shop to shop. What matters is whether or not it does the job you want it to.I think this is a big mistake and repetition of bad information over the past 20-30 years so that it is now taken as gospel. In many articles almost the exact wording is used as if it were copied and pasted over and over.
The vid you posted agrees with my statements here.I don't want to argue with Mike as I respect what he is saying - the foreplane with a cambered or radiused iron is a MUCH better tool for this "roughing job"
I think what we are getting hung-up on is terminology and Stanley might have created the terminology in 1925: The Origin of the Stanley #40 Scrub Plane: A Hypothesis
There is a link to a PWW Swartz article, but I am no longer a subscriber so I couldn't read that... (Maybe that is what Pete is quoting above) but I am going to search for that or something on the LAP blogs since I am sure there is something there...
Now to climb out of this rabbet hole and head for home...