I'm going to build a dust collection for my new Bosch CM10GD glide saw (stealth gloat). I've read a bunch of articles and forum posts on the challenges of taming dust on the miter saw, and seen a lot of the solutions.
I plan to build a box behind the saw, with some inserts to block off the front of the box. Most of my cuts are at 90 degrees, so I'd only have to remove these inserts when making angled cuts. I'll have the dust port on the saw itself hooked up to a shop vac, but I want to use my cyclone to capture the dust that typically escapes to the sides.
Option A is to create an rectangular opening at the back/ bottom of the box, optionally with some tapered sides to guide the dust. This appears to be the prevalent design, as demonstrated in this video. I could use an HVAC fitting such as the one shown below to make it easy to go from rectangle to round, or use a regular takeoff in the center.
Option B is to capture the dust at the top of the box. This is not as common, but looking at this video it appears quite effective. The design is also simpler. However, any dust that doesn't get captured would accumulate in the back.
Option C would be combining these two options. That then leads to the question on how large to make the openings. I have a 3HP cyclone with 6" PVC duct work. Should I run 6" to both top and bottom (maximizing volume), or would two 4" ports (maximizing velocity) be better?
My gut tells me option A is probably the most effective, but why enjoy woodworking and life in general when you can agonize over this?
I plan to build a box behind the saw, with some inserts to block off the front of the box. Most of my cuts are at 90 degrees, so I'd only have to remove these inserts when making angled cuts. I'll have the dust port on the saw itself hooked up to a shop vac, but I want to use my cyclone to capture the dust that typically escapes to the sides.
Option A is to create an rectangular opening at the back/ bottom of the box, optionally with some tapered sides to guide the dust. This appears to be the prevalent design, as demonstrated in this video. I could use an HVAC fitting such as the one shown below to make it easy to go from rectangle to round, or use a regular takeoff in the center.
Option B is to capture the dust at the top of the box. This is not as common, but looking at this video it appears quite effective. The design is also simpler. However, any dust that doesn't get captured would accumulate in the back.
Option C would be combining these two options. That then leads to the question on how large to make the openings. I have a 3HP cyclone with 6" PVC duct work. Should I run 6" to both top and bottom (maximizing volume), or would two 4" ports (maximizing velocity) be better?
My gut tells me option A is probably the most effective, but why enjoy woodworking and life in general when you can agonize over this?